The familiar circle of twelve signs is a useful fiction. Like time,
space, gender and money, it helps us organize our particular, parochial
sense of reality. We watch our transits or progressions as they speed or
plod along this imaginary line in the sky that we call the ecliptic, as if
it were a narrow highway with hard curbs in the vastness of starry space.
In our ephemerides, for example, we see Mercury zipping merrily along, 1E
g, then 2Eg then 3Eg. We see Pluto passing the same mileposts—little
knowing that Pluto might actually lie thirty degrees from Mercury, way
above or below it in the sky, even though we say they are “in
conjunction.” In actuality, the only moving astrological point that
sticks exactly to the ecliptic is the Sun. Its path, in fact, is what
defines the term. Everything else follows it only approximately.
Ever
wonder why we don’t have a total solar eclipse every month? Sure enough,
there on your computer screen you plainly see the transiting Sun and the
transiting Moon aligned in 15Ed 24'—but no total eclipse of the Sun. The
reason is that the Moon is usually a little above the Sun or a little
below it. They are “conjunct,” but only in the context of our
imaginary celestial railroad track, the zodiac. They are lined up in the
two-dimensional framework of the ecliptic, but not in the three
dimensional framework of the heavens as they actually meet our eyes. (1)
When a
planet gets far enough from the ecliptic, it begins to produce some very
curious effects. It is said to be “Out of Bounds.” The fact that it is
behaving strangely in the sky gives us a broad hint as to its astrological
meaning. We will get to that very soon. The point is that looking at the
zodiac in the familiar sign-and-degree way, we would not even notice this
condition. The planet’s position would just seem to be a normal zodiacal
degree, nothing more. But, conventional astrology aside, we would
definitely notice the practical impact of this Out of Bounds planet on our
lives.
Of all
the planets, the Moon is most dramatic in it effects when Out of Bounds,
in my experience. In fact of all the astronomical loose ends that
are basically ignored in mainstream astrological practice, this Out of
Bounds Moon is one of the most astonishing in its repercussions. But to
understand it precisely, we need to think outside the box—rather
literally—of our fiction that planets all move along one narrow track in
the sky. And to escape that trap we must begin with a meditation upon the
four seasons.
SEASONS, EQUINOXES,
SOLSTICES
Back in
school, most of us learned about why Earth has seasons. In summer, our
planet is tilted toward the Sun. The visual effect is that the Sun rises
higher in the sky and the days last longer. The opposite happens in winter—Earth
is tilted away, so the Sun is lower and the daylight is briefer—and the
weather cools down.
Earth’s angle of tilt varies over very long scales of time, but it is
currently at about 23E28' according to the Solar Fire Help files.
Wikipedia gives 23E26'. (2). In this article, I am going to go with
Solar Fire’s value. Visualize it like this: say you are sitting in
spaceship about a zillion miles above the Earth’s equator—you are way
off to the “side” of the Earth, so to speak. You are far enough out in
space that you can see the Sun too, with Earth orbiting it. From your
point of view, at one moment the top of the Earth seems to be tilted
23E28' to the left. Six months later, with Earth halfway around the Sun,
it is still tilted 23E28' to the left. So at first, with the top
half the Earth pointed sunward, the northern hemisphere would be getting
most of the sunlight. Six months later, with Earth still tilted the same
way but on the other side of the Sun, the top half of the Earth is now
tilted away from the Sun. It’s Australia’s turn for a suntan.
(3)
That is
the first critical link in our chain of understanding. Here is the second
one.
If you
are in the northern hemisphere, you are always looking a bit “down” on
the Sun. That’s why “southern exposure” sells houses—in the north,
the Sun always arcs across the southern sky. In the southern hemisphere,
it is the opposite situation. There the Sun sticks to the northern sky.
In the
noon-day heat of summer, we might be tempted to say that the Sun is right
overhead. But it really isn’t. Up here in the northern hemisphere, the
Sun will always be just a little bit to the south, even at the summer
solstice when the seasonal tilt is at maximum and the Sun is highest in
the sky. Only down near the equator can the Sun ever be truly
overhead. Another way to say it is that, with the Sun truly overhead, a
vertical stick would cast no shadow. To experience that sight, you have
got to be south of 23E28' North Latitude or north of 23E28' South Latitude—pretty
close to the equator, in other words. Otherwise, the Sun will always be at
least a small angle away from vertical.
This
shadow-less region of truly vertical sunlight is called the tropics, and
they are defined precisely in this astronomical fashion. Only within the
tropics, and even there only a certain days of years, can the Sun can
physically be straight overhead. Outside the tropics, it can never rise
that high. (4)
Here is
the third link in our chain: we can extend Earth’s equator out into
space and visualize it projected onto the imaginary “celestial
sphere” that surrounds us. Similarly, projected out onto starry space,
the “celestial tropics” extend from 23E28' north of the celestial
equator to 23E28' south of it, the same as on Earth. The Sun in its annual
cycle ranges between these extremes. Thus, at the northern summer solstice,
the Sun’s declination is 23E28' North—that is how far it is from the
celestial equator. It is as high as it can get in the northern hemisphere.
At the northern winter solstice, the Sun’s declination is 23E28' South—even
at high noon, it lies way down low near the southern horizon. Thus, the
ecliptic weaves seasonally between the boundaries of the tropics, crossing
the celestial equator twice at the Equinoxes, but also reaching 23E28'
above it and, six months later, 23E28' below it at the Solstices. (5)
In the southern hemisphere, the timing is the same, except six months out
of phase.
This
maximum limit of 23E28' declination, south or north, applies rigidly
to the Sun. But not to the Moon or the planets. They can go beyond it.
Mercury and Mars can reach 27E and Venus can, occasionally, go a degree
further. The rest tend to stay within the tropics.
Okay,
end of science class. When a planet’s declination exceeds 23E28' North
or South, it is described as being Out of Bounds. There are no
shades of gray here, nothing gradual or subtle. Right at that point,
something clicks.
The
term Out of Bounds originated with the late astrologer Kt (say “Kay Tee”)
Boeher in her now-rare book, Declinations, The Other Dimension. (6) A
decade ago, NCGR’s Geocosmic magazine published an entire edition
strictly on declination (Spring, 1998). It was edited by the late, great
Frances McEvoy, with whom I had many valuable discussions on the subject.(7).
The issue contains articles by Charles Jayne, Leigh Westin, Karen
Christino, Martha Ramsey, Ken Gillman,, Barbara Koval, Richard Nelson,
Valerie Vaughan, Bruce Scofield, Kris Brandt Riske, Charles and Lois
Hannon, Edward Dearborn and Kt Boeher herself. (8) Still, despite that
burst of fanfare, not many astrologers today employ this Out of Bounds
technique.
I
suspect that a hundred years from now we all will, for reasons I am about
to demonstrate.
THE
OUT-OF-BOUNDS MOON
What
does it mean astrologcally for the Moon to be Out of Bounds? Start with
one merrily anarchic notion: when the Moon’s declination exceeds 23E28'
North or 23E28' South, it has escaped the physical space dominated by the
gravitational “boss” of the solar system, the Sun.
Let the
metaphors free-associate.
The
Moon is then, in other words, out of the King’s sight. No longer under
Daddy’s thumb. We might say that has moved beyond the Pale. Gone out of
control. Or gone wild. It has broken the rules. It has shattered the
boundaries, broken the mold, crossed the Rubicon. Bravely, or drunkenly,
the Moon has said, “Roll the dice.”
The Out
of Bounds Moon is spontaneous, emancipated, liberated, released in its own
recognizance, and utterly on its own. It has loudly proclaimed,
“You can take this job (. . . marriage, church, obligation, moral
principle, town, duty . . .) and shove it.” The Moon has claimed
its genius, its passion, and its right to be itself. No need to obfuscate,
to be diplomatic, or to lie to anyone anymore—unless you feel like it.
No more coprophagious grin. No need to worry about staying in anyone’s
good graces. Out of Bounds, the Moon no longer plays the game. It rejects
all rules that are not of its own making. “Free at last, free at last!
Thank God Almighty, we are finally free at last!,” said Martin Luther
King, Jr.
The
words stir the blood. But we need to let them stir the mind as well. ‘
Structure, discipline, and a world in which our actions have consequences—these
are not purely negative things. Society and its values can have a
steadying effect upon us, even when we feel frustrated by them. The Out of
Bounds Moon, like everything else in astrology, has an unpleasant,
dangerous side as well as a divine purpose. Its dark side is sociopathic,
even criminal—or merely selfish and insensitive to others. It can be
cold, even inhuman.
You may
detect some of the underlying spirit of the planet Uranus and the sign
Aquarius in these words. That is quite accurate. In my experience, an Out
of Bounds Moon has distinctly Aquarian quality. We see the familiar
Uranian “holy trinity” at work—the Genius, the Revolutionary and the
Criminal. All three of them stand outside the normal structure of
society, applying leverage to it—and meeting resistance, condemnation,
and consequences for it.
As with
Aquarian or Uranian influences, the Out of Bounds Moon often thrusts
alienating circumstances upon a person from outside. This is of course the
classic working of synchronicity—what we meet (or fail to face) in our
inner world is encountered in the “random” realities of our outer
lives.
Inwardly, the Out of Bounds Moon often correlates with feelings of being
an outsider, of not fitting in, of not having a place in this world. This
can be painful—and it can also lead to an attitude of not giving a
damn. Or to passivity. Or to resentment. And to radical forms of
existential creativity.
DO I HAVE AN OUT OF
BOUNDS MOON?
That
question is easily answered, given modern astrological technology. (See
Sidebar) Most astrological software allows you to calculate
declinations. Just set up your birth chart and look for the Moon’s
declination. If it is greater than 23E28' north or south, it is Out of
Bounds.
Most of
the popular forms of software offer many different kinds of on-screen or
printed charts. Typically, there are more technical versions, along with
the simpler ones that an astrologer might give to a client. You will very
likely find declination listed in the techie version. Similarly, many
ephemerides list declination as well.
More
broadly, there are some years in which many babies are born with Out of
Bounds Moons, and some years in which none at all are. This is related to
the 18.6 year retrograde cycle of the Moon’s orbital plane—what
creates the lunar nodes. (9) We will spare you the details, but here is
the bottom line. Every 18.6 years, the Moon reaches its maximum possible
declination of 28.5E, a full five degrees outside the tropics. In the
years halfway between, we get a kind of “low tide” effect, with the
Moon never getting more than 18.5E from the celestial equator. Under those
latter conditions the Out of Bounds Moon cannot exist at all. No one born
in those years has one.
Thus,
over the time-scale of 18.6 years, about half the people born might have
an Out of Bounds Moon and about half them could not possibly have one.
Furthermore, some of the “good” years for Out of Bounds Moons are more
productive than others. That is because times when the Moon goes further
Out of Bounds, it stays that way for longer as well. The odds improve.
Even in
the “good” years, every couple of weeks the Moon’s monthly orbit
brings it back “within bounds” as it passes through the neutral ground
between maximum northern and maximum southern declination. It may, in
other words, be wildly Out of Bounds in one person’s natal chart—but
in the chart of a person born just a week later, the Moon is in 0E
declination, as normal as vanilla ice cream. But then a week after that,
it is wildly Out of Bounds again.
You
really have to calculate it, is the bottom line.
Remembering all our caveats, here are the absolute peak years for Out of
Bounds Moon births in living memory: 1913, 1931-32, 1950, 1969, 1987-88,
2006. We will have another one in 2024-25. Remember to give it at least a
couple of years on either side. During those years a lot of kids were born
with Out of Bounds Moons. But they were mixed in with a large population
of more steady, conventional types. Looking at those years, note how the
correlations with periods of social unrest and social creativity are
rather unmistakable. As ever in astrology, what is “in the air” at
given moment lives on for decades longer in holographic form in the
children.
NINE QUALITIES
I have
identified nine qualities that are related to the Out of Bounds Moon. They
are arbitrary and they overlap. Undoubtedly there are other categories
waiting to be discovered. I would like first briefly to introduce these
categories at a theoretical level, then follow with some well-known living
examples that bring the theory into the practical realm.
CHOOSING TO LEAVE: Often people born under the Out of Bounds Moon display
a tendency to walk away from situations which more conventional
individuals might consider prestigious or desirable. Voluntarily, they
exile themselves from success as it would be defined at the tribal level.
BOLD, GROUNDBREAKING GENIUS The classic definition of genius is the
ability to “think outside the box,” and people born under the Out of
Bounds Moon often display that quality abundantly. Of course they are not
all necessarily “geniuses” who will be remembered in history. Far more
often they are more normal people who simply display unique talents and
quirkish interests. I believe that historical geniuses tend more than
average to have Out of Bounds Moons, but it is also significant to note
that many recognized geniuses do not have it.
BREAKING OUT OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS. We are all heavily programmed from
childhood by the forces of sociology and demography. A soul born into the
ghetto and a soul born into the Country Club would naturally be expected
to go down different roads in life. Yet with the Out of Bounds Moon, we
often see a pattern of escaping these constraints of social training and
expectation.
SOCIOPATHY AND CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. On the dark side of the equation, the
Out of Bounds Moon can indicate an indifference to consensual and
universal laws of moral and ethical behavior. Cold-hearted destructiveness
and amorality can arise—what we might call “criminal behavior” in an
absolute sense rather than in a legalistic one.
ALLEGED SOCIOPATHY AND CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. Of course criminality is to some
extent in the eye of the beholder. Those who simply follow their own path
in accord with natural law might sometimes be accused of such deviations.
Jesus was duly tried and convicted, for example. And then there are
situations of crimes alleged but not proven, where the truth remains murky.
Out of Bounds Moon people are often implicated in all of these kinds of
circumstances.
“NICE” OUTLAWS . Where would we be without people who experiment with
the boundaries of morality, normalcy, and risk? The “naughty” part of
ourselves identifies with them and celebrates them. We might not be brave
enough to follow in their footsteps, but part of us goes there vicariously
and experiences an emotional lift. Out of Bounds Moon people often fit
this description..
THEOLOGICAL OUTLAWS. Every society has its religion, in some sense of the
word—a set of beliefs by which both reality and moral behavior are
defined. The Out of Bounds Moon is often present in thinkers and spiritual
teachers who stand outside that framework. They may illuminate us, or
offend us, or simply encourage us to ask paradigm-challenging questions.
ZANY CHARACTERS. Every town has its eccentrics. They may seem edgy and
dangerous, or entertaining, or delightful, or funny, or just weird. Each
eccentric tends to be eccentric in his or her own way—that’s really
the point! In whatever style or fashion these eccentrics may go about
stretching the limits of the expected, there is an elevated tendency to
find the Out of Bounds Moon in their natal charts.
LITERALLY, OUT OF THIS WORLD. Sometimes symbolism is very concrete. The
Out of Bounds Moon is found in the charts of many who leave the boundaries
of this world in more-or-less concrete ways.
Those
are my theoretical impressions of the Out of Bounds Moon, fleshed out by
my experience in the astrological counseling room. Please remember
that, as ever, astrology is multi-factorial. There are many people who fit
the above descriptions, but who do not have Out of Bounds Moons. Various
other astrological configurations, mostly in the Uranian-Aquarian
categories, can produce similar effects. The key is that we often
encounter someone whom these shoes fit, but who from a more mainstream
astrological perspective should be more conventional. That is where the
Out of Bounds Moon proves itself.
With a
similar caveat about “everything else being equal,” the lack of an Out
of Bounds Moon also has discernable meaning. It implies, not a dull person,
but a steadier one. There is an even-keeled, eye-on-the-prize quality.
Generally one would expect more stability over the long haul in life’s
major categories: career, marriage, geographic location, spiritual
orientation, and so on.
Below
you will find a list of well-known people with Out of Bounds Moons in
their natal charts. I have listed them in these broad behavioral
categories, described above. Some of the people appear more than once
since they illustrate more than one feature of the Out of Bounds Moon.
(10)
Choosing to leave . . . 1960's music star Cat Stevens, who left his
stardom behind to follow his Muslim faith. Henry David Thoreau giving up
the normal comforts of life and society and choosing to live at Waldon
Pond. Kurt Cobain, a musician who committed suicide at the height of his
fame. Al Gore, who left the American political world and choose instead to
operate as an “outsider” environmental crusader. Queen Victoria, who
withdrew from the public for forty years after her husband Albert died.
Bold, groundbreaking genius . . . The luminous Italian
novelist, Umberto Eco. The endlessly brilliant British musician, Peter
Gabriel. The avant-garde composer John Cage. The mind-twisting graphic
artist, M.C. Escher. .Billie Holiday, the blues singer who made being
Afro-American sexy and relevant in white society. Louis Pasteur, who first
understood bacterial infection. Paradigm-shattering physicist Albert
Einstein. Babe Ruth, often considered the greatest baseball player who
ever lived. Wilhelm Reich, Austrian-American psychoanalyst and advocate of
sexual liberation.
Breaking out of social constructs . . . Oprah Winfrey, who transformed the
face and purpose of televison. Jesse Ventura, the pro wrestler who became
a governor. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, the action movie star who became a
governor. Edgar Mitchell, lunar astronaut turned psychic researcher.
Freddie Mercury, openly-gay singer with the band, Queen, who was among the
first make being gay “cool.” Amelia Earhart, who pioneered the female
role in aviation. Christopher Reeve, actor who played Superman and who
became paraplegic. Bob Geldof, punk rocker knighted by the Queen. And
again, Billie Holiday, the blues singer who made being Afro-American sexy
and relevant in a white society.
Sociopathy and criminal behavior . . . Carlos the Jackal, the
international assassin. Mike Tyson, Heavyweight boxing champion often in
legal trouble. Legs Diamond, famous American gangster. Peter Sutcliffe,
The Yorkshire Ripper. Josef Dietrich, Head of the Nazi S.S. Augusto
Pinochet, brutal Chilean dictator. Roman Polanski, film director and
convicted pedophile. Manuel Noriega, corrupt Central American dictator.
Lucky Luciano, early American Mafia figure. Squeaky Fromm, attempted
assassin of U.S. President Gerald Ford. John Wilkes Booth, assassin of
U.S. President Abraham Lincoln. Paul Joseph Goebbels, propaganda leader
for the Nazi Party.
Alleged sociopathy and criminal behavior . . . Mary Queen of Scots,
beheaded for allegedly plotting against the Crown. Salman Rushdie,
victim of a Fatwa for his irreverent writing. Jimmy Hoffa, murdered union
organizer with alleged Mafia connections. Alleged tax-evader Rupert
Murdoch, media mogul who has become a bete noir for the political left.
Edith Piaf, French cabaret singer addicted to drugs. Catherine The Great,
who allegedly had her husband murdered in order to become Empress of
Russia.
“Nice” outlaws . . . American Frontiersman, Davy Crockett. Female
sharpshooter, Annie Oakley. “Outlaw” musicians, Willie Nelson, Jimmy
Buffet, and Tom Waits. Camilla Parker Bowles, lover of Prince Charles.
Theological outlaws . . . Spiritual teacher Ram Dass, Pagan
visionary Starhawk. Cat Stevens, who espoused a religious faith unpopular
in his own culture. Stephen King, who has brought the occult into the
mainstream. Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, iconoclastic, controversial
guru.
Jeddu Krishnamurti, anti-guru guru. Werner Erhard, founder of est
training. Albert Einstein bears mentioning here too, given the way
Relativity has re-shaped our collective view of reality itself.
Zany Characters . . . Russian president Boris Yeltsin. Activist and
politician Al Sharpton, Amelia Earhart, who eschewed the “feminine”
requirements of her time and thus looked zany in that social context.
Jesse Ventura, the say-anything former pro wrestler turned governor of
Minnesota. Akbar The Great, Turkish-Persian mogul with 5000 wives.
Giovanni Casanova, the “greatest lover in history.” Isadora Duncan,
Roaring Twenties iconoclast. Yoko Ono, artist and provocative wife of John
Lennon.
Literally, Out of this World . . . Yuri Gagarin, the first man in
space. Edgar Mitchell who visited the Moon, and later took up psychic
research. Leonard Nimoy, as Mister Spock, possibly the world’s most
familiar alien. Again, Amelia Earhart who disappeared from this world
while trying to fly around it in 1937.
Naturally, one must weave an Out-of-Bounds Moon into the warp and weft of
the larger astrological framework. But thinking of the Moon simply in
terms of conventional sign, house and aspects actually leaves out quite a
number of potentially potent modifying factors, many of which I cover in
the book from which this article is extracted. Here I am just focusing on
one of them. I look forward to the day when I ask someone about her
Moon and I hear, “It’s in Libra in the fourth house, fast, in Waning
Gibbous phase, and Out-of-Bounds.”
PROGRESSED MOON OUT
OF BOUNDS
The
Moon can go Out of Bounds by secondary progression, with extraordinary
effect. If we reflect for a moment on how secondary progressions are
calculated, however, we soon realize that there are many people who will
never experience this situation. The idea is simple: to know where your
planets are by secondary progression on your thirtieth birthday, you count
exactly thirty days forward in the ephemeris. Those planetary positions
are your secondary progressions. Days become years, in other words. It
follows that the transits of the first three months or so of infancy are
the secondary progressions for the rest of your life.
But
maybe you were born in one of the years in which the Moon’s declination
was never so extreme—say in 1978, for example. The Moon didn’t begin
to reach the critical 23E28' of declination until December 1982. If you
were born in January 1978, you would have to reach the ripe old age of
about eighteen hundred years before your Moon ever progressed Out of
Bounds!
U2's
singer, Bono, for example, was born in a quiet year. His Moon will not
progress Out of Bounds in his lifetime. The same goes for the famously
unflappable Barack Obama, born in 1961. Like Bono, he is immune to the Out
of Bounds condition. But Kurt Cobain, born just six years later tells a
different story. (11) In summer 1991, his Moon progressed Out of
Bounds—and he shot to superstardom with his band’s major label debut
album, Nevermind. His Moon reached its impressive maximum
declination of 27E 48' toward the end of 1993. Four months later, locked
in his expensive home, drugged, alienated, and in hiding, Cobain committed
suicide with a shotgun.
As I
write these words, the country is horribly captivated by the nightmare
mass murder which occurred on November 5, 2009 at Fort Hood, Texas.
Military psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan killed thirteen people and
wounded twenty-eight others in an insane explosion of frustration over the
possibility of being deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan. The only birth data
I have on him is that he was born September 8, 1970 in Arlington,
Virginia. (12) Fortunately, for determining whether someone
has an Out of Bounds Moon, either natally or by progression, just knowing
the date of birth is enough. When the killings happened, Hasan’s Moon
had just recently progressed Out of Bounds. It did so in May 2009, just
six months earlier. On the day of the shootings, it was in 25E 14'.
In Kurt
Cobain’s story we see tragedy, alienation—and a classic example of
“choosing to leave.” With Nidal Malik Hasan, obviously there is
“sociopathy and criminal behavior.” We can, in broader terms, apply
the logic we explored about the natal Out of Bounds Moon to the progressed
one. With progressions, instead of a fundamental, relatively stable
condition of the psyche, we see a more transitory one. By the way, with
both Cobain and Hasan, their natal Moons were also Out of Bounds, and the
interaction between the innate natal condition and the progression which
exaggerates it is of course acute.
Arnold
Schwarzeneggar was elected governor of California on October 2003. His
Moon had progressed Out of Bounds in Spring 2000 and remained in that
condition until late 2004. In the improbably reality of being a
heavily-accented Austrian action film star turned governor, he nicely
illustrates “breaking out of social constructs.” He does pretty well
as a “zany character” too. In an earlier experience of a prgressed Out
of Bounds Moon, starting in Spring 1960, Schwarzeneggar would literally
break into a closed gym on the weekends so he could train as a bodybuilder.
(13) I think we could fairly call that “alleged sociopathy and
criminal behavior.” He was breaking the rules, but harming no one. Maybe
he qualifies for “nice outlaw” too.
In
1517, Martin Luther published his famous Ninety-Five Theses disputing the
Church doctrine that the forgiveness of sins could be purchased for money.
The nailing of these theses to the door of the church at Wittenberg is
often seen as the critical moment of ignition in the Protestant
Reformation. At that time, Luther’s progressed Moon had just passed its
peak, reaching a declination of 28E01' North—wildly Out of Bounds. Here
we have perhaps our finest illustration of the “theological outlaw.”
(14)
In
September 1905, six months after his Moon had progressed Out of Bounds,
Albert Einstein published the paradigm-shattering Special Theory of
Relativity. He thus clinches our “bold, groundbreaking genius” award.
Fourteen years later, his Moon again progressed Out of Bounds. Just as it
was doing so, the Theory of Relativity was essentially proven when
starlight was seen to be deflected by the Sun’s gravity during a total
solar eclipse. Instantly, Einstein was catapulted into the strange “Out
of Bounds” world of fame which his legendary name still occupies.
Finally, with his progressed Moon Out of Bounds again between late 1946
and late 1950, Einstein espoused unpopular socialist beliefs and
campaigned against nuclear proliferation. (15) For that, let’s
give him a “nice outlaw” award. He deserves a mention for “zany
character” too, given his wonderful hair and wise-bumbling affect, which
was the inspiration for Yoda in the Star Wars films.
Last
but not least, for our “literally, out of this world” title, who could
be more deserving than the first man ever to orbit the earth? On April 12,
1961, Yuri Gagarin boldly went where no one had gone before—and his
progressed Moon was at 27E 26' South declination, every bit as Out of
Bounds as he was.
We
modern astrologers have been bombarded by an avalanche of new techniques.
Life is too short to learn them all, let alone to use them in any
practical context of astrological counsel with the clock ticking and
another client due in an hour. All of us must pick and choose among these
riches. I hope I have made the case to you that the Out of Bounds Moon,
while often overlooked, is a major piece of the astrological puzzle.
{End of article. Below is the sidebar. Below that, all footnotes}
SIDEBAR
CALCULATING THE OUT OF BOUNDS MOON
With so
many different kinds of astrological software in use, the simplest
suggestion is to just go to the “Help” files in the program you use
and look up “Declination.” There you will see how to display it for
any chart you calculate. Declination will be given as either North or
South, sometimes shown as a + or - . If the value exceeds 23E28', it is
Out of Bounds. This will work for both a natal chart or a progressed one.
In the
popular Solar Fire program, here are the steps. Calculate or open a chart.
Click on “Reports” in the top line. Click on “Current Chart.” A
window opens titled “Chart Reports & Tabulations.” Under “Chart
Points,” you will see a column labeled “Decl.” That is declination.
Check to see if the Moon’s value is 23E28' or greater. If so, it is Out
of Bounds. Again, this will work for both a natal or progressed charts.
To
watch for the Moon progressing Out of Bounds over longer time-scales, open
the natal chart, then click on “Dynamic” on the top line. Click on
“Graphic Ephemeris.” Open “Saved Selections,” scroll down and
click on “Declination of Moon (one year).” Under “Period of Report,”
click the “Years” button (unless you want to zoom in on a specific
period of your life).
Set your date of birth as the “Start Date.” Under “Period,” enter
a number greater than your age in years, depending on how far into the
future you want to look. In any case, make its value at least
nineteen so it is long enough to see one whole sweep of the Declination
cycle. Under “Ephemeris Selection,” be sure to click “Progressions.”
Right under that, you will see a window that says “Longitude.” Open
that window, and scroll down to “Declination.” Enable that. “Dynamic
Type Progressions” defaults to “secondary.” Leave that in place.
Under “Point Selection,” go to “Progs.” I like the visual
simplicity of “Sunmoon” rather than ones that show all the planets,
but do as you like there. Click “View” and a graphic appears. The
Moon’s cycle is the big, obvious wave, like a sine curve. Declination is
the vertical dimension. Time is the horizontal one. Use the cursor to
trace the Moon’s line. You will see a read-out that gives the date and
the Moon’s declination. When (if) the Moon goes beyond 23E28', North or
South, it is Out of Bounds.
1. Michael Zeilik, Astronomy: The Evolving Universe, Third Edition, Harper
& Row, 1982, p. 19.
2. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropics, (Accessed November 16, 2009)
3. Michael Zeilik, Astronomy: The Evolving Universe, Third Edition, Harper
& Row, 1982, pp.10-12.
4. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropics, (Accessed November 16, 2009)
5. Martin Seymour-Smith, The New Astrologer, Collier, 1981, p. 45
6. Kt Boeher, Declinations, the Other Dimension. I have never seen this
book, nor been able to locate further information about it. I learned
about it indirectly through references in other people’s work. Even an
Internet search of rare book sites revealed nothing. For an article about
declinations by her, see http://www.mandala.be/declination/boehrer1.htm. (Accessed
November 17, 2009).
7.. Frances McEvoy’s astrological “salon” in Belmont Massachusetts
just outside Boston was legendary in the astrological community of the
northeastern United States. I would often stay in her home when speaking
to the Boston chapter of the NCGR, enjoying delightful and provocative
astrological negotiations into the wee hours. R.I.P., Frances!
8..For back issue of Geocosmic magazine, Spring 1998, See: http://geocosmic.org/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=A&Product_Code=J_98SPR&Category_Code=
9. Steven Forrest, Yesterday’s Sky, Seven Paws Press, 2008, pp 105-109
10. All chart data in this section comes from
http://www.AstroDataBank.com. In determining whether someone’s Moon is
Out of Bounds, strict birth time accuracy is not necessary, so here I
suspended my usual custom of working only with Rodden A or better data.
11. Again, thanks to AstroDataBank.
12. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malik_Hasan
13. See http://www.schwarzenegger.com/en/news/askarnold/news_askarnold_eng_legacy_444.asp?sec=news&subsec=askarnold.
Retrieved April 18, 2008.
14. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther
15. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein
BIO
Steven Forrest is the author of several astrological bestsellers,
including THE INNER SKY and YESTERDAY’S SKY. Most recently, working
under a generous grant from the Integrative Medicine Foundation, he has
completed work on THE BOOK OF THE .MOON. His work embraces free will,
grounded humanistic psychology and ancient metaphysics. He runs two active
Apprenticeship Program in California and one in Australia. See his website
at www.sevenpawspress.com or contact him at
stevenforrest@mindspring.com
Steven Forrest
POB 82
3260 East Star Road
Borrego Springs, CA 92004
760
767-4720
by Steven
Forrest -
All Rights
Reserved